Submitted by Sweatpants on Sun, 11/22/2009 - 17:16.
Way less pictures next time. Try keep it under 2.
Submitted by heritage on Sun, 11/22/2009 - 17:31.
precisely what i came to say. you do too much, they all just blend together and it's just "oh some sci-fi covers..um...cool?" and no one actually really looks at any of them.
Submitted by schlitz on Sun, 11/22/2009 - 21:30.
yup.
Submitted by SherejaRage on Sun, 11/22/2009 - 17:47.
Exactly. Too many pictures post has too many pictures. Quality not quantity, remember that for future posting.
Submitted by Edzell_Blue on Sun, 11/22/2009 - 18:07.
Well I enjoyed this post.
Submitted by iownafordprobe on Sun, 11/22/2009 - 19:07.
fuck the haters this post is bomb titties.
Submitted by grissgross on Mon, 11/23/2009 - 01:08.
This! I actually looked at all of them and thought they were cool.
Submitted by lettucealone on Sun, 11/22/2009 - 22:12.
I REALLY LOVE POSTS THAT TAKE ME 3 SOLID MINUTES TO SCROLL THROUGH
Submitted by Valis5 on Mon, 11/23/2009 - 03:27.
I love 50's through 70's pulp SF cover art. The foreign and alternate covers were the best ones here, IMO. Great post.
And while not all posts should be this long, I feel sorry for people who can't follow a theme for more than two or three images. To think that some people who frequent sites that are an endless stream of images and ideas don't have an attention span that is long enough to process a grouping of 30 images without losing interest makes me kind of sad. Well, and laugh, but still a little sad.
Submitted by Nyx on Mon, 11/23/2009 - 06:22.
great post, thanks. these covers make me want to read these books. even though I know they'll be terrible.
Submitted by maeryk on Mon, 11/23/2009 - 22:29.
Some of em are really good.. Van Vogt and Heinlein, and Goulart. Though the cover art in those cases has little, if anything, to do with the material of the books. And: Yay! Frazetta!
Submitted by PorkRocket on Mon, 11/23/2009 - 22:04.
Alright. I'll chunk the fuckers up a bit next time. After all, we wouldn't want to disappoint the goddamn ghetto now would we?
But, you know, some people *do* like 'em a bit on the LONG side...
Comments
Way less pictures next time. Try keep it under 2.
precisely what i came to say. you do too much, they all just blend together and it's just "oh some sci-fi covers..um...cool?" and no one actually really looks at any of them.
yup.
Exactly. Too many pictures post has too many pictures. Quality not quantity, remember that for future posting.
Well I enjoyed this post.
fuck the haters this post is bomb titties.
This! I actually looked at all of them and thought they were cool.
I REALLY LOVE POSTS THAT TAKE ME 3 SOLID MINUTES TO SCROLL THROUGH
I love 50's through 70's pulp SF cover art. The foreign and alternate covers were the best ones here, IMO. Great post.
And while not all posts should be this long, I feel sorry for people who can't follow a theme for more than two or three images. To think that some people who frequent sites that are an endless stream of images and ideas don't have an attention span that is long enough to process a grouping of 30 images without losing interest makes me kind of sad. Well, and laugh, but still a little sad.
great post, thanks.
these covers make me want to read these books.
even though I know they'll be terrible.
Some of em are really good.. Van Vogt and Heinlein, and Goulart. Though the cover art in those cases has little, if anything, to do with the material of the books.
And: Yay! Frazetta!
Alright.
I'll chunk the fuckers up a bit next time.
After all, we wouldn't want to disappoint the goddamn ghetto now would we?
But, you know, some people *do* like 'em a bit on the LONG side...