At a glance she certainly seems like a MUCH better candidate than Obama, but to me she seems to lack experience and a real record of actual successes. I'm afraid it's gonna be a while before Americans get over the mistake they made in electing someone simply because they liked what he had to say. Her BIG plus to me, is that I don't think she's at ALL a liar. It WOULD be awfully nice to have a more honest President than Obama. Also, awfully easy.
If all of them jumped off a roof, would you jump off a roof?
Quit making excuses.....
My advice? Forget "person". Think "Presidential Candidate". We aren't supposed to be electing someone to just be another person.
First, I'd try to get arrested for something. You know, just to get shit really rolling news-wise.... maybe jerking off in a McDonald's at noon while wearing a cape and logged on to Facebook....
You're on MY post now, little feller.... oh, wait.... there's nobody to talk to on your lame ass re-posts. I guess you get lonely...
You couldn't handle it. Way too much of a wimpy pussy..... not to mention fat and lazy.
Having most people on SG agree with you is nothing to be proud of.
I am aware of the exceptions that make the rule, such as yourself. I was once very much like you.
I hope that doesn't terrify you too much.
He's a failure because in almost every instance of a prior campaign promise, he has not done what he said he would do, and in many cases he evidently never even intended to try. Not accomplishing what you say you will attempt or try to do is one thing. Not doing what you PROMISE you WILL do is another. The only reason Liberals are the least bit concerned that he will lose this election is because of his clear record of failures/lies. Mitt Romney has NEVER lied, or failed to keep his campaign promises as President of the United States. But you'd rather reelect a proven liar/failure of a President than someone from another party?
THAT'S partisanship to the point of stupidity. Obama is counting on it. Again.
Back To Top