No matter how you cut it, rewarding Obama's failure is a horrible idea.
- Tolland Man's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Navigation
User login
Merch!
Affiliates
Games
Search
Recent comments
Staff Contact Links
Who's new
- belleswan
- marcowarner
- Latchkey
- Robert Paulson
- ADuabbasia
- ENFORKARTINNA
- stephen_420
- Sereks
- poopdookieturd
- ericbobcock
Comments
At a glance she certainly seems like a MUCH better candidate than Obama, but to me she seems to lack experience and a real record of actual successes. I'm afraid it's gonna be a while before Americans get over the mistake they made in electing someone simply because they liked what he had to say. Her BIG plus to me, is that I don't think she's at ALL a liar. It WOULD be awfully nice to have a more honest President than Obama. Also, awfully easy.
Did Obama "lie" about bringing down all the lobbyists in Washington or about closing down Guantanamo bay to gain more voters....or did he think he could actually accomplish these things? I don't know but either way, he couldn't do it even if he wanted to because Presidents are becoming less powerful these days. Special interest groups are calling the shots.
If all of them jumped off a roof, would you jump off a roof?
Quit making excuses.....
Anyway, the liberal way of 'trying' is putting their had out and saying "give me money and fix this for me."
My advice? Forget "person". Think "Presidential Candidate". We aren't supposed to be electing someone to just be another person.
First, I'd try to get arrested for something. You know, just to get shit really rolling news-wise.... maybe jerking off in a McDonald's at noon while wearing a cape and logged on to Facebook....
...drunk.
Damn your country is in far more trouble than mine then.
Albert Einstein
Liar.
so there.
potato?
shit, i'm hungry again. but that's good, i lost so much weight lately
also, what's a "crackdown"?
nice word, by the way. As in, "Street protests against strict marijuana laws in Poland have exacerbated the conflict between the fascist, right wing government and people, and led to several crackdowns resulting in arrest of "free hemp" leader"
You're on MY post now, little feller.... oh, wait.... there's nobody to talk to on your lame ass re-posts. I guess you get lonely...
Carry on.
You couldn't handle it. Way too much of a wimpy pussy..... not to mention fat and lazy.
Having most people on SG agree with you is nothing to be proud of.
I am aware of the exceptions that make the rule, such as yourself. I was once very much like you.
I hope that doesn't terrify you too much.
But if you are conservative and you believe that he's failed unless he's fulfilled a typically conservative interest, or made it his priority focus, then, yes, you could say that he's failed. - or if you have unrealistic expectations for any president. i.e. he's also not fixed the entire national economy and every ailing area with it, or fixed climate change, or created total world peace, or walked on water either. If that's your expectation, yes, you could say he's failed
He's a politician who know's how to compromise for the closest he can get with his interests and the interests of the people he represents,
He's a failure because in almost every instance of a prior campaign promise, he has not done what he said he would do, and in many cases he evidently never even intended to try. Not accomplishing what you say you will attempt or try to do is one thing. Not doing what you PROMISE you WILL do is another. The only reason Liberals are the least bit concerned that he will lose this election is because of his clear record of failures/lies. Mitt Romney has NEVER lied, or failed to keep his campaign promises as President of the United States. But you'd rather reelect a proven liar/failure of a President than someone from another party?
THAT'S partisanship to the point of stupidity. Obama is counting on it. Again.