so let me see if i understand your resin coated logic; if you give money away to the military industrial complex and not hold anyone accountable for that unrivaled waste (as Hannity would say) it's being a great 'mericun, but if you use a fraction of that money to take profits out of healthcare and begin the process of dismantling an industry that should have never existed in the first place it's Marxist social engineering,...
Submitted by Tolland Man on Sat, 07/14/2012 - 13:29.
What the fuck are you talking about? What makes you think I followed that link, and even know what the fuck it implies? I was just throwing out a random insult at someone who is busy throwing out random insults. Assuming you weren't always an idiot, your anger and hatred has made you into one.... and a pretty decent sized one at that.
I especially like the clearly ironic question "what grade are you in Tolland?" as it shows quite a bit about your level of mentality. You're obviously a big doo doo head. So there.
while that may be true, the rate at which we are spending on military has leveled off under the current administration, the huge spending rate increases occurred while W was in office. Where the fuck was all this outrage with the out of control spending of money we didn't have back then? I'll tell you where the outrage was: It didn't fucking matter to repub/neocon/conservative pukes because the president was white! The increase in the rate of military spending should have alarmed everyone but nobody cared,... but put a black man in the white house and those red states get so excited they fucking glow.
yeah, complained around the last 4 months of W's presidency while the country plunged into this mess created by republican controlled trickle down economic system that was in place for over 30 years (which Clinton was a part of). Those complaints were largely due to the bail out of banks, big business, and TARP after the country was plunging into a global depression + add the wars that we didn't need to fight (Iraq). That was Bush's mess. A mess that wasn't address until the end of his 8 year term,.. but again,. no one complained back then like they are today.
I am not talking about foriegn policy; that is another animal entirely. i am merely pointing out the hypocracy among the right. they never had issues with W spending money he didn't have, allowing billoins in waste (skimming by haliburton and blackwater and war profiteering), and wasting the 250 billion surplus he inherited from clinton. you put a black man in the white house, ans it's a red state 180° in full nazi lock step and suddenly the budget is the biggest concern they have. .
first off, staying on topic is not being selective; yyou want to start a foreign policy thread i'll be happy to join in. wanting to counter my point by throwing anything at it to see if it sticks is just plain sxhitzophrenic and derectly out of the right wing playbook. secondly, the only people denying the surplus ever existed are rightwingers. that surplus number was originally published by the CBO
You won't get what your looking for out TM Man,,,he's a troll and a racist one at that. You will never get him to cough up anything other than "Obama sucks cuz I said so",,,,
of course, he's a box of rocks i.ve been watching his schtick for well over a year and it's tired, played out, and predictablw. say something he disagrees with and you're a liberal this and that exactly like it's done on right wing radio. give him logic and he attacks you and tries to changes the subject or he'll go full on freakshow and begin to project how he feels about himself onto you...... he can eat the corn out of my shit
"say something he disagrees with and you're a liberal this and that" and you didn't just do the same thing above with your "the only people denying the surplus ever existed are rightwingers"?
shut the fuck up douche. you are neither funny or clever... it's all in your head. i speak for a lot of us here when i say the ghetto was better before you and you lemmings started posting your micheal savage regurgitation here. thr real irony is that you fell for my post hook, line, and sinker just like i knew you would. i knew exactly who my audience was and you ate that shit up like birthday cake. you stupid, dueling banjos inbreeder.
i like that i.m educated and filed tax return near $100,000 this past year because i make shit happen and not look to scape goating my problems on a race of people while posting yo-yo memes and thnking i'm clever
Submitted by Tolland Man on Tue, 07/17/2012 - 15:02.
First thougfht is of government cheese? Interesting. And in typical lazy, hypocritical, Liberal fashion, you would rather silence, and thereby ignore, your criticism than deal with it.
So, my crumbs of cheese could go to a more deserving person? Like maybe an unwed Black 27 year old woman with 5 children by 5 missing, mystery fathers? How many of those do you think you are already helping support? You wanna continue to encourage others to jump on the gubment cheese gravy train? Vote Obama.
You folks need to grow up, accept personal responsibility, quit blaming others, quit crying like children, and above all, quit making excuses for the people among you that have no excuses. Racism? I do not criticize people because I believe they are inferior. They aren't. Some merely act like they are. And THAT is what I criticize.
Dear Peice of talking shit, Seems like the real welfare queens are the "Job Creators". Tell me, if these job creators have been the recipients of the majority of welfare given out by the USA, where are the jobs? They're creating them,. they're just creating them over seas. So these politicians you support have duped you which isn't surprising since you prolly barely scraped by high school and called it an eduction. SO let's blame Obama for not creating jobs instead of holding the job creators who took the welfare responsible,.. that makes TOTAL SENSE! But let's look closer at the social welfare numbers shall we? Here is what MSU has to say about who receives the money given away to the po' folk in this country;
Myth #1: The typical welfare recipient is a black inner city single mother.
The Census Bureau's most recent annual poverty report found that urban black mothers constitute less than one out of six of all poor households. Rural white families account for more--one out of five. White surburban families accountfor even more--one out of four.
Other sources claim the following
White 38.8% Black 39.8 Hispanic 15.7 Asian 2.4 other 3.3
So what did we learn today? That you are a racist piece of shit who insists that Micheal Savage and Mark Levin is gospel because you are too intellectually lazy to go beyond talking points and research shit for yourself.
Submitted by Tolland Man on Tue, 07/17/2012 - 21:09.
What did we learn? Really? Well, I learned that Jambo believes what he reads on the Internet **IF** what he reads supports his argument. When you research the opposition sites (lol), for this same information, what do you see? The same numbers? Of course not. The site you visit will post their skewed numbers derived in a fashion that reflects their prejudice. Did you get your information from Michael Savage's site? Of course not. You got it from some other site. One that reflects your beliefs. Black urban single mothers VS rural white single mothers.....blah,blah,blah... White suburban families with more than two cars and a dog named Jack have more that 2/3 chance of being 1/3 less likely to know someone poor. Did you know that? LOL Also, your numbers are not an accurate indication of anything because they are not complete. And because you are a racist.
But.... when you yourself go to the welfare office, in any town, at any time of day, what do you see with your own two eyes? LOLOLOL..... don't be so fucking stupid. Admit the truth. And resolve to make things better, rather than deny, deny, deny, blame, blame, blame, cry, cry, cry,whine, bitch, and complain.
that's funny, the only people i know on welfare are white. So that must mean that you're wrong and Michigan,State is wrong cuz 100% of welfare recipients are poor white peiple
i know a coupleof them, they're rare where i live though. Most residents of Oakland come from along line of Scandanavians so you never see blacks here.
Submitted by Tolland Man on Wed, 07/18/2012 - 13:01.
I know a LOT of Black people. I have lived with Black people. As in shared residence. I have been in business with Black people. And I have known a lot of my Black friends for a LONG time. So, which of us is speaking from experience? I don't know many Scandinavians though, so when you want to talk about the Scandinavians, I promise I'll listen.
you are not a source; you have no credentials, education, expertise, no successes to point to which make you an authority on anything.... you are a talking piece of shit whose only success is spewing disinformational opinionated sludge on a website.
Submitted by Tolland Man on Sat, 07/14/2012 - 18:28.
WOW.... You really don't mind exposing your ignorance, do you? You say I am not a source? Well, you certainly are. A constant source. Of amusment. Yep, you amuse me. Like a fucking clown.
Submitted by Delphiaticalizm on Sat, 07/14/2012 - 20:06.
NO we aren't! I don't have the energy....I should not have made that response....we ended on a good note about politics so sorry for opening up another can of worms....you're right I'm a racist for wanting the shirt! Whatever?
Submitted by Tolland Man on Sat, 07/14/2012 - 20:10.
Since Liberals keep widening the definition of racism (strictly so that they can accuse more conservatives of it), the new definition of racist is now anyone who criticizes someone of another race for anything. After that it SHOULD be widened to include anybody who dislikes anything or anybody else of any race. Eventually it will come to mean everybody, all the time. These are the logical steps in eliminating that stupid, worthless accusation altogether. Liberals have made it worthless by using it so broadly. It's like crying "wolf" now. Shame. It used to mean something.
Comments
That's definitely not why I'm a piece of shit, and it has absolutely nothing to do with your being a piece of shit either.
Stop making crybaby excuses. It makes you sound like Obama.
what grade are you in Tolland?
What the fuck are you talking about? What makes you think I followed that link, and even know what the fuck it implies? I was just throwing out a random insult at someone who is busy throwing out random insults. Assuming you weren't always an idiot, your anger and hatred has made you into one.... and a pretty decent sized one at that.
I especially like the clearly ironic question "what grade are you in Tolland?" as it shows quite a bit about your level of mentality. You're obviously a big doo doo head. So there.
I'll tell you where the outrage was: It didn't fucking matter to repub/neocon/conservative pukes because the president was white! The increase in the rate of military spending should have alarmed everyone but nobody cared,... but put a black man in the white house and those red states get so excited they fucking glow.
I remember all the complaints about how Bush was a war monger and then those same people cheered Obama on when we went into Libya.
So screw off on your bogus complaints. Bush and Obama (and Romney) are basically all the same person.
You aren't talking about.......right, you want to wallow in the same selective outrage that you want to complain about others.
I see where shots were fired in the Persian Gulf today. Rah, rah. Let's kill them all.
By the way, Clinton left no surplus and if you weren't a clueless moron you would have known better than even claim it.
Bush and Obama will both go down as complete failures and we will get a long line of these failures as long as people like you are around.
secondly, the only people denying the surplus ever existed are rightwingers. that surplus number was originally published by the CBO
While we're not forgetting, try and remember that Obama is a colored man, and that he ate a fucking dog.
of course, he's a box of rocks i.ve been watching his schtick for well over a year and it's tired, played out, and predictablw. say something he disagrees with and you're a liberal this and that exactly like it's done on right wing radio. give him logic and he attacks you and tries to changes the subject or he'll go full on freakshow and begin to project how he feels about himself onto you...... he can eat the corn out of my shit
and you didn't just do the same thing above with your "the only people denying the surplus ever existed are rightwingers"?
plus... well, you Godwinned this thread man. gg
I make another joke about racists, and you call me a racist. Obama lies to you like a motherfucker, and you vote for him.
Humor and irony are completely lost on you.
thr real irony is that you fell for my post hook, line, and sinker just like i knew you would. i knew exactly who my audience was and you ate that shit up like birthday cake. you stupid, dueling banjos inbreeder.
I like it that I get to you, that I get under your skin. It means that unlike your precious Obama, what I do, I do effectively.
You do know you're a racist don't you?
Typical tolerant Liberal. LOLololol
You colored folks don't have any idea how stupid your hypocrisy looks to normal ol' White people.
there's prolly a more deserving person your stipend of government cheese could go to
First thougfht is of government cheese? Interesting. And in typical lazy, hypocritical, Liberal fashion, you would rather silence, and thereby ignore, your criticism than deal with it.
So, my crumbs of cheese could go to a more deserving person? Like maybe an unwed Black 27 year old woman with 5 children by 5 missing, mystery fathers? How many of those do you think you are already helping support? You wanna continue to encourage others to jump on the gubment cheese gravy train? Vote Obama.
You folks need to grow up, accept personal responsibility, quit blaming others, quit crying like children, and above all, quit making excuses for the people among you that have no excuses. Racism? I do not criticize people because I believe they are inferior. They aren't. Some merely act like they are. And THAT is what I criticize.
Seems like the real welfare queens are the "Job Creators". Tell me, if these job creators have been the recipients of the majority of welfare given out by the USA, where are the jobs? They're creating them,. they're just creating them over seas. So these politicians you support have duped you which isn't surprising since you prolly barely scraped by high school and called it an eduction. SO let's blame Obama for not creating jobs instead of holding the job creators who took the welfare responsible,.. that makes TOTAL SENSE!
But let's look closer at the social welfare numbers shall we? Here is what MSU has to say about who receives the money given away to the po' folk in this country;
Myth #1: The typical welfare recipient is a black inner city single mother.
The Census Bureau's most recent annual poverty report found that urban black mothers constitute less than one out of six of all poor households. Rural white families account for more--one out of five. White surburban families accountfor even more--one out of four.
Other sources claim the following
White 38.8%
Black 39.8
Hispanic 15.7
Asian 2.4
other 3.3
So what did we learn today? That you are a racist piece of shit who insists that Micheal Savage and Mark Levin is gospel because you are too intellectually lazy to go beyond talking points and research shit for yourself.
KILL YOURSELF!
What did we learn? Really? Well, I learned that Jambo believes what he reads on the Internet **IF** what he reads supports his argument. When you research the opposition sites (lol), for this same information, what do you see? The same numbers? Of course not. The site you visit will post their skewed numbers derived in a fashion that reflects their prejudice. Did you get your information from Michael Savage's site? Of course not. You got it from some other site. One that reflects your beliefs.
Black urban single mothers VS rural white single mothers.....blah,blah,blah... White suburban families with more than two cars and a dog named Jack have more that 2/3 chance of being 1/3 less likely to know someone poor. Did you know that? LOL Also, your numbers are not an accurate indication of anything because they are not complete. And because you are a racist.
But.... when you yourself go to the welfare office, in any town, at any time of day, what do you see with your own two eyes? LOLOLOL..... don't be so fucking stupid. Admit the truth. And resolve to make things better, rather than deny, deny, deny, blame, blame, blame, cry, cry, cry,whine, bitch, and complain.
It's illegal to ask that question.
Who continues giving Wall Street this welfare? Obama. Shumer was begging Bernanke to get the Wall Street welfare programs revved up again today.
Again, back the original point. Hypocrisy. Bitch about welfare for the rich and then defend those giving that welfare out.
Only a racist would think that shirt is racist....Definition of the post Obama reverse racist thinking process.....your above statement.
HEY!! You leave us alone. We're talking about racism here!